Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Nov 2000 20:46:13 -0200
From:      "Fabrizzio Batista" <Fabrizzio.Batista@lojasobino.com.br>
To:        <cjclark@alum.mit.edu>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: NAT with redirect_port
Message-ID:  <001e01c051b1$5bea0ae0$65010180@lojasobino.com.br>
References:  <000701c050d1$afc84ae0$65010180@lojasobino.com.br> <20001117222040.H9740@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

----- Original Message -----
From: Crist J . Clark <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Fabrizzio Batista <Fabrizzio.Batista@lojasobino.com.br>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: NAT with redirect_port


> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 06:05:06PM -0200, Fabrizzio Batista wrote:
> >
> >     Hi gurus,
> >
> >     I´m using NAT with redirect_port in SMTP and everything is fine when
the
> > clients are out of my internal net. But when I try to access my internal
> > Server from a internal client, the redirect_port in natd not work.
> >
> > 200.12.1.1   200.12.1.2        192.168.1.2                192.168.1.1
> > Internet -------> Server With NAT ---------> SMTP Server
> >     From 200.12.1.1 : telnet 200.12.1.2 25 -> It´s Works
> >
> > 200...    192.168.1.2/ ----------Internal Client
> > Server With NAT -----------> SMTP Server  -> NOT WORK
> >     From 192.168.1.3: telnet 200.12.1.2 25 -> It´s not work
> >
> > natd -n rl0 -redirect_port 192.168.1.1:25 25
> >
> > So, anybody help me ???
>
> When someone tries to access the internal server from the internal
> network, it goes to the NAT machine which accepts the packet. It is
> never run through the natd(8) process since the packet never gets
> processed on the external interface (the one with the divert(4) rule).
>
> It is very ugly to try to fix this. It is much easier to use the
> local name on the internal machines. If you really want to go the
> other way, it involves running another instance of natd(8) on the
> internal interface.
> --
> Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu
>

    I´ have tried to use nat in two interfaces, but looks like only works in
one interface. When I try to use in two interfaces, only the first is that
works.
    I added another divert rule to new interface in ipfw rules.

    Do you have any idea ???

    Thanks,

    Fabrizzio



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001e01c051b1$5bea0ae0$65010180>