From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 13 11:19:46 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF2616A41F;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:19:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E0443D45;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:19:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.4.9])
	by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x)
	id 1EF8pD-0001AB-Uf; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:19:44 +0400
Message-ID: <4326B5CF.1070606@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:19:43 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pav@FreeBSD.org
References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com>	
	<4326A53C.5020808@FreeBSD.org>
	<1126609121.54365.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>	
	<4326B439.4090308@FreeBSD.org>
	<1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:19:46 -0000

Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> 
> Sounds very specific for a general article on pkg-descr.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better in Section 6.4 instead?
> 

May be. If I'm sure, I'd give you a patch :)

-- 
Sem.