Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:35:28 -0500
From:      Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: zfsboot and zfsloader: normalization of filesystem names
Message-ID:  <50632ED0.2050901@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201209260941.29016.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <505DEF5F.8060401@FreeBSD.org> <201209260941.29016.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/26/2012 8:41 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:03:27 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Currently zfsboot uses the following format to specify a ZFS filesystem name in
>> a full file path:
>> poolname:filesystem/name:/path/to/file
>> ZFS loader uses this format:
>> zfs:poolname/filesystemname:/path/to/file
>>
>> The following patchset:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfs-boot-naming.diff
>> unifies the naming.
>> zfsboot format will be: poolname/filesystemname:/path/to/file
>> Note that it is still different from zfsloader - "zfs:" prefix is missing.  This
>> is because unlike the loader zfsboot supports only ZFS filesystem, so the prefix
>> is redundant.  But I can still add support for it if there is a popular request.
>
> I think this idea sounds sound.  You could easily let zfsboot support both by just
> having it skip over a 'zfs:' prefix if it sees one.
>
My $0.02 -- Keep "zfs:" in for consistency's sake.

-- 
Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50632ED0.2050901>