Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:48:02 +0200 From: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org, Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: docs/87445: comments for improvement of handbook/kernelconfig-config.html Message-ID: <4350FA82.4050201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051015123615.GC1202@gothic.blackend.org> References: <200510142331.j9ENV8nA099971@freefall.freebsd.org> <1129364021.653.11.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20051015055837.2a3b9035.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20051015122036.GT99170@submonkey.net> <20051015123615.GC1202@gothic.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
>>[ Moved to doc@ from some other place ]
>>
>>On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 05:58:37AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Or perhaps
>>>4.X will be knifed from the handbook. And most likely, the
>>>only people who will expect it coming will be those that aren't
>>>going to stand in my way.[1] :)
>>>
>>>[1]: Please don't take that as if it's rude, I'm actually
>>> joking around with it. Cause I know that if someone
>>> tried that, well, to core && doceng they'd be explaining.
>>
>>Actually that's a great idea. There's no reason why we couldn't, like
>>today, commit a copy of the current handbook to handbook4 and then get
>>rid of all the crud from the real handbook. Same deal with the FAQ.
>>The information is still available then, but we no longer have to tear
>>our own hair own trying to maintain the documents.
>>
>
>
> If people agree with that idea, let's freeze a Handbook4 and stop
> "supporting" 4.X in docs. (By "freeze" I mean no any new
> addition/change beside typos.) Let's then create a HANDBOOK_4 (or
> something like that) tag for CVSup operations.
> We could do the same for Handbook5 when 5.X will be dropped.
> Well, we could do the same as the Security Officer and set up a schedule
> for releases Handbook/docs support; this schedule will allow us to know
> when a HandbookX freeze will happen.
>
> Marc
I am very much in favor of this idea. Though, should we really tag
another branch? We recently branched the documentation for RELENG6
so we might want to just use that? instead of duplicating that
information. On the other hand, a nice schedule and the availability
of 'old' unused branches is also very nice.
I'd say, go for it :-)
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org
FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org
Reporter DSINET ** remko@DSINet.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4350FA82.4050201>