From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 22:19:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0F716A4CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 22:19:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.schatti.ch (zux183-070.adsl.green.ch [80.254.183.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9728D43D7B for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 22:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listman@schatti.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 2050) by mail.schatti.ch with local; Fri, 13 May 2005 22:29:37 +0000 From: "mail.schatti.ch" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:29:37 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Subject: Hints for small file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:19:16 -0000 If you had to choose amongst the available filesystems on 5.4 to contain just about 500kB to a MB, which would you use, and with what parameters ? Which of these has the lowest administration overhead, the lowest space overhead ? TIA George