Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Apr 1999 06:50:58 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Thomas Dean <tomdean@ix.netcom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local
Message-ID:  <3717B0C2.9C61D788@newsguy.com>
References:  <199904162129.OAA93936@ix.netcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Dean wrote:
> 
> I see the latest /etc/defaults/rc.conf will include either or both of
> /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local.
> 
> I only want to have one.
> 
> Which is going to stay with us the longest?

/etc/rc.conf, though rc.conf.local is not likely to go away. The
former is the "do your stuff" standard file. The later is a
machine-specific override when you have a standard rc.conf for many
machines, and need to tweak specific parameters in a few.

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3717B0C2.9C61D788>