Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:12:34 +0300 From: Mike Barnard <mike.barnardq@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: bce+lagg Message-ID: <AANLkTineaBlMRcYtrs84CEkgemBbOrzYgsW5lUiREJ_M@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I am testing the implementation of link aggregation on FreeBSD 8.1 PRE-RELEASE and I see to be getting a problem with the bce interface. I am using an HP DL 380 G6 with 4 Ethernet interfaces. If I configure the cards individually, I can reach other devices on the network. When I enable link aggregation, I can ping the hosts IP address, but I cannot ping its gateway. my setup is as follows ifconfig_bce0="up" ifconfig_bce1="up" ifconfig_bce2="up" ifconfig_bce3="up" cloned_interfaces="lagg0 lagg1" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport bce0 laggport bce2" ifconfig_lagg1="laggproto failover laggport bce0 laggport bce2" ipv4_addrs_lagg0="10.100.100.27/32" ipv4_addrs_lagg1="192.168.0.12/32" defaultrouter="10.100.100.1" static_routes="management" route_management="-net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1" running /etc/netstat gives me "host is unreachable". If I manually enter the default route, I get the same error. If i disable lagg1, I get the same error when I run /etc/netstat or try to enter the route manually, but, when I try to ping the default gateway, I get "device is busy" With lagg0 and lagg1 up, if I try to ping any of the gateways, I get "no route to host", but with only the lagg0 interface I get "device is busy" Is this a problem with the bce Interface or am I missing something. PS: I have an implementation running FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE with fxp interfaces and its working fine. -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTineaBlMRcYtrs84CEkgemBbOrzYgsW5lUiREJ_M>