From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Aug 6 18:43:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from wenet.net (pm3-5.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C40515754 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 18:43:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by wenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA05015; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 01:02:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 01:02:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: Mike Hoskins Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advocacy site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Mike Hoskins wrote: > There's a couple of options here... We can work like hell to bring the > old advocacy site back, and then stay actively involved in it to keep it > up to date... > > Or, we can help with what's already been proposed, and integrate > everything that was on advocacy into the freebsd.org site... giving us > one, easily-navigatable, up-to-date, whiz-bang site. Uhh, I don't see how integrating the advocacy site with the freebsd.org site will reduce the amount of effort needed to get it up to speed. It'll just shove the energy required around so that more of the burden is put on the committers. > Either way, I see a similar need... HELP, from US. Bashing back and > forth doesn't get us anywhere. Yup. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message