From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 25 06:53:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC1316A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.otel.net (gw3.OTEL.net [212.36.8.151])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6F743D2D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:53:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tbyte@OTEL.net)
Received: from dragon.otel.net ([212.36.8.135] helo=OTEL.net)
	by mail.otel.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1Aw0Pr-000Ecj-2T; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:53:39 +0200
Message-ID: <403CB6F4.9000502@OTEL.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:53:40 +0200
From: Iasen Kostov <tbyte@OTEL.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040224
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
References: <200402251448.i1PEmjmZ032110@soth.ventu>
In-Reply-To: <200402251448.i1PEmjmZ032110@soth.ventu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bad loopback traffic not stopped by ipfw.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:53:41 -0000

Andrea Venturoli wrote:

>** Reply to note from Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:21:34 +0300
>
>
>  
>
>>P.S. This is really off-topic already. We should move to -isp@ may be.
>>    
>>
>
>I don't really think so, why would it be?
>It's concerning ipfw, netstat, traffic and the IP stack in general, I believe.
>
>N.B. I'm obviously willing to move if it is decided so.
>
> bye
>        av.
>  
>
	I think thar Gleb talks about the "virus thing" :).