From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 02:20:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net (smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net [154.33.69.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BDE43D55 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from scan3.jp.viruscheck.net ([154.33.69.38] helo=mail4.jp.viruscheck.net) by smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Ce2IO-0001s6-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:12 +0900 Received: from [220.108.149.115] (helo=noc.orchid) by mail4.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1Ce2IO-0000kE-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:12 +0900 Received: from [89.60.10.11] (horse.orchid [89.60.10.11]) by noc.orchid (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBE2KAI1044197; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:11 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <41BE4DD5.7030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:05 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041122 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Weisgerber References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libtool, not installing .la files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:15 -0000 Christian Weisgerber wrote: >What are the current hacks to avoid installing .la files? > >My libogg and libvorbis ports used to not install .la files. Now >I'm getting mail from kris' scripts that the libogg port misses >libogg.la from its plist. Wondering why I get no report for >libvorbis, I checked that port only to see that kris has already >added the .la files to the plist there. > >Apparently the libtool changes in recent months have changed things, >but in between USE_LIBTOOL_VER, USE_INC_LIBTOOL_VER, and USE_GNOME=lthack >I'm lost. What's the proper way to deal with a port that uses >libtool to build its libraries? How to skip .la? > >Is this documented anywhere? > > > Check ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk. Ports version of libttol skips .la files instalation. Therefore looks like you just need to axe INC word. All the best, Alexander.