Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 01:21:33 -0500 From: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: union nethostaddr no longer defined for src/sbin/mount_nfs.c Message-ID: <199806010621.BAA27920@cerebus.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <199806010614.QAA13173@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199806010614.QAA13173@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 1 June 1998 at 16:14, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: > No, rev.1.33 of src/sys/nfs/nfs.h is a prerequisite for > rev.1.27 of src/sbin/mount_nfs/mount_nfs.c, so clobbering > of rev.1.33 in rev.1.40 broke mount_nfs.c. Yes, that is what I was trying to get across in my original message. I think you've stated it more clearly than I (except it was revision 1.37 of nfs.h that undid revision 1.33). [snip] > >I guess the question in my mind is which is more important > >with regards to the NFS code: > > > >* Progress towards a less ``polluted'' environment, OR > >* Kernel and header source code compatibility with other > > BSD systems > > I don't like pollution, but implemented consistent pollution. :-) > Bruce Thanks, Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNXJIbDeRhT8JRySpAQEC6gQAgqNuOhHgM9VSPEX6rbFCxclVDFx27erC sFPphgTeCF28ox+fiZegsUMDHqiqSKHaCD6tyK0uwLOeN/cgwuVkenZrkeGykYpL GMH5WsUa/hj+/RkkH/ZR23n26fdRdY3Ods4/doJLCdRUmU9YghhLJkYfxM+rf9Bq B5r5rGt3QvA= =ksYo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806010621.BAA27920>