From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Dec 3 09:00:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08C4A3C745 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD588106C for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB390o9s066689 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:00:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204943] usr/src/sbin/newfs_msdos/mkfs_msdos.c:586: memory leak ? Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:00:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:00:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204943 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- >Although this fix is not wrong as such, fixing the memory leak in this >extremely rare error case does not make much sense if the happy path and error >cases that may actually happen still leak the memory. True, but if there were leaks on the main path, I'd have reported them before a leak on an error path. More detail: $ ~/cppcheck/trunk/cppcheck --enable=all usr/src/sbin/newfs_msdos/mkfs_msdos.c Checking usr/src/sbin/newfs_msdos/mkfs_msdos.c... [usr/src/sbin/newfs_msdos/mkfs_msdos.c:586]: (error) Memory leak: img $ I see no evidence of any other memory leaks, or any other detectable problems, in the source code file. A patch for the leak has been produced, problem closed AFAIK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.