From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 01:02:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7914C16A505 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01EB43DF0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206A45193D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:00:29 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:00:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:02:10 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 17:18, Eric Schuele wrote: > FWIW... Its my understanding that > - the memory saved would be negligible. As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that they free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of memory cache. OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to degrade performance much.