From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 30 18:45:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04041C87; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x231.google.com (mail-ea0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310DB2484; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f15so908465eak.8 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HY3pzKcMBJtjPAoFXbgwe1WYggwD4U1N3qZ44S8JyEc=; b=H8lfLcSwZcVB7acd09N52yz7Rtz0H7I5INP3enF+WOOZbidBNPaYOZ+TUQuZexPYZR z2XsLCanAGFVW2lyiDuxjhCcd1jTHZ+Y2h2aWokhVDfqVWFNpKuHSiu8VFbyl6gFYb9q 1wLH1PNcX73M8v9JNw1mK18PBBd79HpHZ/zvDPaCAxyrO1l0k0ySBj2Ne/j74N1UurER 3oAbuIVyZK/KsrlvLQLaxTdhqMvGgxvh1Q2h5iTAY0t77YykvbQgc8aeSI4aXIWMylBm zQut83WgSCgxJLEYY69yWBJKMc1roqQAlgiX7hp+WFSjoym/BTjZ7KJFKhuUcP6TxPjK mv9w== X-Received: by 10.14.175.129 with SMTP id z1mr17483952eel.69.1375209943411; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from llea.celt.neu (xdsl-89-0-83-142.netcologne.de. [89.0.83.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 43sm18873415eek.5.2013.07.30.11.45.41 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51F809D5.80705@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:45:41 +0200 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121104 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabor Pali Subject: Re: Ocaml ports needs love References: <20130227132633.GI16178@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51C9E5A4.2060502@gmail.com> <51F51F99.6080502@gmail.com> <51F5226B.4030206@marino.st> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marino@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:45:46 -0000 Gabor Pali wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:53 PM, John Marino wrote: >> Is not opam already in ports? >> http://www.freshports.org/devel/ocaml-opam/ > Yeah, but OPAM 1.0.0 may not be the best choice for FreeBSD... Due to > some trivial but annoying bugs OPAM will not work properly on FreeBSD. > I am currently using the git version > 83019d40090b7a44bd0e8a3b9ec4e55c4620df4d where those problems have > been fixed. Is it trivial to use the 1.0.0 port to build the version you are referring to? I would like to start using opam on FreeBSD to find out how it could be incorporated to ports system.