From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 25 19:19:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108A616A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:19:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD16D43D39
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:19:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=roam.psg.com)
	by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD))
	id 1DQ970-000Agz-KO; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:19:18 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=roam.psg.com.psg.com)
	by roam.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD))
	id 1DQ96z-0002Jh-Fq; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:19:17 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17005.17076.978073.249234@roam.psg.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:19:16 -1000
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se>
	<426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org>
	<426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de>
	<17005.12955.757773.350868@roam.psg.com>
	<20050425181329.GA41455@xor.obsecurity.org>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:19:19 -0000

>>>> not always be clean.  Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
>>>> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
>>> Why "hopefully"?  Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
>> i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-)
>> i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted
>> single user and fscked manually show errors.  though i think this
>> may be in current, which is on most of my hosts.
> Yeah, others have reported this problem on -current, but 5.x does not
> have it.

when will it be mfced to 5.x?  :-)

randy