From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 21:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0E916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.122.132.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DB43D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:50:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:50:11 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20040627215011.GA26845@nagual.st> References: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:30 -0000 On 27 Jun Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: >> What international standard describes their format? >> Windows is not a standard. > > Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a "real" > standard. That's precisely what M$ is aiming at. It's just a wrong attitude. A standard is a standard. "de-facto" does NOT equal "standard" The fact that a program can handle those non-standards is cool, but that's it. -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya