From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 16:45:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFBF16A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E382443D3F for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:45:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159FF2BD8C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:45:16 +1100 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 465395121C; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:15:14 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:15:14 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Lucas Holt Message-ID: <20040322004514.GY52612@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> <20040319174618.GH64130@keyslapper.org> <20040319223506.GA63254@bhunter.net> <20040320195318.GA923@alex.lan> <20040321014349.GJ52612@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: Al Johnson cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top posting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:45:18 -0000 --NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline The following message is the second in a series of three, intended to show why top-posting is bad. See the previous message (Message ID 20040322004337.GX52612@wantadilla.lemis.com) for a version that I consider understandable. "Bottom posting", where you leave the entire previous message, is only marginally better than top posting. If the text is important, you should be reading it. If it isn't, the sender shouldn't have included it. On the contrary, it shows you what the discussion is about. In this example, I'm answering your points one by one. I'll repeat the whole thing with top posting. Tell me if it's easier to read. Agreed, mixing styles is the worst of the lot. That's a very good reason to insist on one style. What's wrong with the convention we have? I'll answer this message a third time in the style you propose. Tell me if it's easier to read. Greg On Sunday, 21 March 2004 at 19:35:48 -0500, Lucas Holt wrote: > Aside from mailing lists, I tend to be a top poster. I don't like when > people leave the last 12 emails and then bottom post.. i have to > scroll all day. The other irritant is people who actually post in the > middle of messages. That breaks the "FLOW" as well. After someone > replies top or bottom its VERY hard to read. > > How about a new convention. Delete everything but the last reply in > the thread when you send to the list and say bottom post. I can live > with that as a top poster. If I don't have to scroll all day to bottom > post, its not a big deal. > > The bottom line is that people reply. This list is here to help users > with FreeBSD. I'd take an answer to my questions in any format! > > > Lucas Holt > Luke@FoolishGames.com > ________________________________________________________ > FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) > JustJournal.com (Free blogging) > > 'I try to think but nothing happens' > -- Homer Jay Simpson -- Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAXjcaIubykFB6QiMRAhWXAJ9KFC6/8O3n452CQtO2ckDCIdVpUACgiPL9 2vXzxiNGk3Zu7bFgRHKv/Vw= =DlWB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NAuYj0K7Umiq33rm--