Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 04:48:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc Makefile ports/textproc/bar Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <20050523044809.GA77292@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1116760711.23538.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <200505201801.j4KI1RVW063530@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050522043540.GA77403@FreeBSD.org> <1116760711.23538.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:18:31PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v ne 22. 05. 2005 v 04:35 +0000: > > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 06:01:27PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > pav 2005-05-20 18:01:27 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > textproc Makefile > > > Added files: > > > textproc/bar Makefile distinfo pkg-descr > > > Log: > > > This is a small shell script intended to be used in portable Unix install > > > scripts for showing progress bars. > > > > OK, but what has this to deal with text processing, as its category suggests? > > After all, it very well fits in `misc' IMHO. > > Hmm, it's _processing text_ to indicate how far we are in copy? > > I could imagine this in shells too, but never misc! misc should be never > used unless absolutely necessary. Agreed about `misc'. That's why I said "after all", implying that no other suitable enough category found. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050523044809.GA77292>