Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:16:27 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@hammer.village.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oh No! __sF undefined -> bump all major number of all libraries Message-ID: <20021013021627.GA76789@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <200210130143.g9D1hk8S008000@hammer.village.org> References: <200210130143.g9D1hk8S008000@hammer.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> (10.12.2002 @ 1843 PST): M. Warner Losh said, in 0.5K: <<
> We need to bump every major number of every library in the ports system.
> Otherwise, when people upgrade,
when people upgrade what? a port? their base?
> they won't be forced to upgrade things
> ports depend upon.
if the libraries haven't changed, why should they be rebuilt? and if
they DO need to all be rebuilt, why not just do portupgrade -f --all?
why _force_ people to upgrade things?
> We should have done this months ago when -current
> depricated it over a year ago.
when current deprecated what?
> But I suspect the issue isn't as simple as black and white, so I'm guessing
> there's a good reason for why this wasn't done...
i'm missing something here... sorry for the backtracking.
- -Adam
- --
"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
-Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
Adam Weinberger
adam@vectors.cx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE9qNd7o8KM2ULHQ/0RAn9RAKCG5hIZ8atWrLzwpHAJO+HNlTqpCwCg2mO6
QGyjm59fQSIt4rINUily0VY=
=rhnR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021013021627.GA76789>