Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:14:09 +0000 From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, devet@devet.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately? Message-ID: <200111201514.aa72952@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:56:40 MST." <200111200556.fAK5ue780788@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200111200556.fAK5ue780788@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >: >: Awesome...great explanation. Might be a couple days until my next >: release notes editing session, but I'll write something up based on what >: you gave me. > >Ah, this is a change in behavior in -stable. I think that deserves an >UPDATING entry. I hadn't got that before now. I probably missed something important earlier in this thread, but installing the debug versions of the modules seems like a bug, since we don't install the debug version of the kernel. Adding "DEBUG=-g" has always simply required more space in /usr/src, but not affected the installed size. Does installing the debug versions of modules make sense at all, or is it just hard to fix the makefiles to stop it happening? Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200111201514.aa72952>