Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0200 (MET DST) From: Nick Hibma <nick.hibma@jrc.it> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/9064: [PATCH] propose adding `direct' option in fetch(3) Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.990713163016.6764S-100000@elect8> In-Reply-To: <xzpg12sd3t4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This functionality belongs in the proxy library, not in fetch, > > so it is available for all programs, IMHO. > > What proxy library? Duh. I thought we used a shared library for that. Mea culpa. > Anyway, I have a replacement for fetch(1) in the pipeline. It's just > that I seem to have this *thumb* stuck up my *butt*... :) Any hint on what is different, better, faster, more colorful, and does it make coffee? Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.990713163016.6764S-100000>