From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Oct 17 02:58:37 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA20616
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 02:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA20611
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 02:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by mail.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id CAA19951; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 02:58:21 -0700
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 02:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017042515.4767A-100000@spirit.ki.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017025714.16113R-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on
a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher.
:)

In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is
reading, this is disturbing.

 > vs local drive (1.78M/s and 938k/s):
> IOZONE performance measurements:
>         1784080 bytes/second for writing the file
>         938585 bytes/second for reading the file
> 
>