Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:23:40 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updated vfs patches Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980417141611.17404A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980417133824.17216A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Michael Hancock wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/~mch/vop1a.diff > > 1) In the original code, ext2_rmdir and msdosfs_rmdir release the lock > across the truncate call but ufs_rmdir doesn't. The ufs_rmdir > implementation make it clean for me because I just delete the vput(), but > in ext2_rmdir and msdosfs_rmdir I must reacquire the lock so the generic > layer can do the vput() (phew!). I'm not sure if we should be holding a > lock across truncate and I have yet to review the logs yet to see why. > Perhaps someone can shed some light on this. I found it (POST_SOFTUPDATES)! Do we not block when calling truncate with softupdates on? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980417141611.17404A-100000>