Date: 10 Jun 1998 17:04:53 -0500 From: stephen farrell <stephen@farrell.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone running the linux emulation as an LKM under 2.2-stable? Message-ID: <877m2osyka.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:29:52 -0700" References: <18591.897488992@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes: > So, can I infer from this that there are people who are _currently_ > using the Linux LKM, do not compile their kernels with COMPAT_LINUX, > and things are just fine with them in 2.2-stable? I'd just like to > have this confirmed by *one* person since the LKM used to work fine > for me too, up until about a week or two ago. :-) couatl# uname -a FreeBSD couatl.uchicago.edu 2.2.6-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 8 21:58:37 CDT 1998 sfarrell@couatl.uchicago.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/COUATL i386 couatl# grep COMPAT_LINUX /sys/i386/conf/COUATL couatl# make sure i'm running the latest linuxmod on my system... couatl# modunload -i 0 Linux emulator removed couatl# linux couatl# modstat Type Id Off Loadaddr Size Info Rev Module Name EXEC 0 4 f631f000 0020 f6326010 1 linux_mod run staroffice... yep I am all of these things... i'm running lkm's and kernel cvsupped June 8. (my world, other than lkm's, was last built may 24). -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?877m2osyka.fsf>