From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 22:38:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4964016A4CE; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:38:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB53C43D39; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:38:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i94MaXII097203; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:36:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:38:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20041004.163808.73381384.imp@bsdimp.com> To: grog@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20041004223426.GJ460@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200410041313.i94DDN1w064795@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041004.095538.105191591.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041004223426.GJ460@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: phk@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:38:53 -0000 In message: <20041004223426.GJ460@wantadilla.lemis.com> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: : On Monday, 4 October 2004 at 9:55:38 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <200410041313.i94DDN1w064795@repoman.freebsd.org> : > Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : >> phk 2004-10-04 13:13:23 UTC : >> : >> FreeBSD src repository : >> : >> Modified files: : >> sys/kern kern_shutdown.c : >> Log: : >> Change the perfectly precise message : >> printf("No buffers busy after final sync"); : >> to : >> printf("All buffers synced."); : >> in order to not leave the users wondering if there should be. : > : > Any not reason to delete : > printf("All buffers synced."); : > entirely? : : I like to see some message to confirm that the process is over and : done with. Something goes wrong often enough that it's good to know : that it worked this time. The machine will either shutoff, reboot or print the 'hit any key to reboot' message in addition. Do we really need an additional message saying that we did the right thing? Warner