Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:30:54 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revoke(2) redux... Message-ID: <20021224123053.GA79469@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <30917.1040730025@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <30917.1040730025@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:40:25PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Wouldn't it in fact make much more sense if revoke(2) was defined as > > int revoke(int fd); /* kick everybody else off */ > > and the code above would look like: An O_REVOKE flag to open might be neater? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021224123053.GA79469>