Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:04:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> To: Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nge not in GENERIC? Message-ID: <20030407175544.J92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <200304071952.43591.thierry@herbelot.com> References: <20030407024249.S92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <200304071952.43591.thierry@herbelot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > Le Monday 07 April 2003 08:45, Andre Guibert de Bruet a =E9crit : > > > > Is there a reason why the MII-based nge(4) doesn't figure in GENERIC? > > because, at least in -Current, nge can be loaded at runtime, as a kld mod= ule. I understand the need to remove drivers from GENERIC for the floppy distribution, but I was thinking more along the lines of having it figure in /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC commented out. Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030407175544.J92580>