Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:23:09 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work? Message-ID: <20050425192309.GA59554@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <17005.17076.978073.249234@roam.psg.com> References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se> <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org> <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de> <17005.12955.757773.350868@roam.psg.com> <20050425181329.GA41455@xor.obsecurity.org> <17005.17076.978073.249234@roam.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:19:16AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > >>>> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be > >>>> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and > >>> Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly? > >> i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-) > >> i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted > >> single user and fscked manually show errors. though i think this > >> may be in current, which is on most of my hosts. > > Yeah, others have reported this problem on -current, but 5.x does not > > have it. >=20 > when will it be mfced to 5.x? :-) As soon as the guy at the switch falls asleep :) Kris --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbUOdWry0BWjoQKURAnqJAKC8EltDCbRuPuAT0jjBXcxnQIcuSwCg8qjK SG82Tt+nzbEFgYxAEVairHc= =05BA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425192309.GA59554>