Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 20:52:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> To: "Paolo Pisati" <p.pisati@oltrelinux.com> Cc: FreeBSD_Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Summer of Code 2005: Improve Libalias Message-ID: <1417.172.16.0.199.1126054335.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <20050906141304.GA31424@tin.it> References: <20050906100348.GA1440@tin.it> <20050906120657.GD41863@cell.sick.ru> <20050906141304.GA31424@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, September 6, 2005 10:13 am, Paolo Pisati said: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:06:57PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> during your work with libalias have you found any bugs or buglets, or a >> rough places, that should be considered to be merged to main FreeBSD CVS >> tree as soon as possible, before next release? > > well, actually i didn't find any bugs in libalias that was not imputable > to my work, but i found 2 bugs in other parts of FreeBSD: > > > 1) kernel panic with ipfw as kld in 5.x and 6.x: > > > kldload ipfw.ko ipfw show (the 65k rule will show up) ipfw add 100 allow > all from any to any ipfw del 100 panic: kmem_malloc: entry not found or > misaligned > > tested on qemu only > > 2) natd crash receiving a SIGHUP > > > launch natd this way (as root): > > /sbin/natd -n <if> -v > > > where if is your nic > > then > > sudo killall -HUP natd > > natd will core dump > > i didn't have time to investigate any further, but if i'm not the only one > to see them, i can take a look... And what is the point of all of this when we have OpenBSD's PF? ipfw and libalias is dead.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1417.172.16.0.199.1126054335.squirrel>