Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:55:09 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>, Jun Su <junsu@delphij.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] bug in cpp's #ident handling in gcc 3.4 [Was: ccache with buildworld] Message-ID: <p0611041ebd53c5ec1d67@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <412E0B6C.8030001@portaone.com> References: <412DF886.4030107@portaone.com> <412E0243.1050808@delphij.net> <412E0B6C.8030001@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:10 PM +0300 8/26/04, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >Pointless. Instead of fixing the problem we will remove condition when >this problem evidences itself. I am not advocating about keeping #ident, >since it is completely orthogonal question. gcc claims that it supports >#ident, there are problems in this support - they have to be fixed. > >Remember, there are lot of software out of /usr/src over which we have >no control (e.g. /usr/ports), so that removing #ident will really be >only half-measure, especially considering that the patch is readily >available. I think it makes sense to fix the handling of #ident. We can also reduce our own use of #ident, but that is a separate issue from fixing (what seems to be) an obvious bug in it. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0611041ebd53c5ec1d67>