From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 29 18:10: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C4537B41C for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2U2A4u96347; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:10:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203300210.g2U2A4u96347@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alan Eldridge Subject: Re: ports/36496: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] for editors/texmacs Reply-To: Alan Eldridge Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36496; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alan Eldridge To: Geoffrey Mainland Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/36496: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] for editors/texmacs Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:07:12 -0500 On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:53:33AM -0800, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: > >>Number: 36496 >>Category: ports >>Synopsis: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] for editors/texmacs Is there a reason why this port still depends on print/latex, thus rendering it destabilizing on most systems, which have teTeX installed? Could the dependencies be changed to teTeX so people can safely install it? -- AlanE "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message