Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:04:45 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: enoch <ixew@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable Message-ID: <20120404210445.GB10911@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <87sjgk5czo.fsf@hotmail.com> References: <20120330233819.GC7325@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F75C5EC.6090303@hotmail.com> <20120402195215.GA3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <jlblna$ptp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120403023225.GD3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87ty11670b.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403183521.GA7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87obr95pxh.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403225422.GB7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87sjgk5czo.fsf@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> >> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP discovery step > >> >> >> >>>> on boot. Now I am using the buggy [nve] instead. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> Can anyone help? > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Did you set synchronous_dhclient option in rc.conf? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Yes: ifconfig_nfe0="SYNCDHCP" > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I guess [nfe] is undergoing gradual devel changes of some sort as before > >> >> >> >> it had some chance of reporting "empty headers" on initial ifconfig and > >> >> >> >> refusing to work. Sorry, I should have reported when encountering the > >> >> >> >> first problems rather than solve by reboot. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Would you show me the output of both dmesg(nfe(4) and its PHY only) > >> >> >> > and 'sysctl dev.nfe.0.stats'? > >> >> >> > It would be also helpful to know whether nfe(4) still sees > >> >> >> > incoming traffic. > >> >> >> > Does assigning static IP work? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Static IP direct communication attempt from this desktop to another > >> >> >> laptop through a crossover cable fails as follows. Thanks. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > >> >> >> options=82008<VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> > >> >> >> ether 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> >> >> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > >> >> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT > >> >> >> <full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause>) > >> >> >> status: active > >> >> >> > >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> >> >> nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce 430 MCP13 Networking Adapter> port 0xf200-0xf207 > >> >> >> mem 0xefffb000-0xefffbfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 > >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > >> >> > > >> >> > It seems you've omitted PHY driver here. What PHY driver was > >> >> > attached to nfe(4)? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > >> >> rgephy1: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 > >> >> > >> >> >> nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> >> >> nfe0: [FILTER] > >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.frame_errors: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.extra_bytes: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.late_cols: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.runts: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.jumbos: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fifo_overuns: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.crc_errors: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fae: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.len_errors: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.unicast: 56 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.multicast: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.broadcast: 280 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.octets: 7517 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.zero_rexmits: 51 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.one_rexmits: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.multi_rexmits: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.late_cols: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.fifo_underuns: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.carrier_losts: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.excess_deferrals: 0 > >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.retry_errors: 0 > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x10003842 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 > >> >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' > >> >> device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' > >> >> class = bridge > >> >> bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xefffb000, size 4096, enabled > >> >> bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf200, size 8, enabled > >> >> cap 01[44] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > >> >> > >> >> Interestingly, now that nfe0 is using a static IP it sometimes boots > >> >> up properly. Are you interested in its good working? > >> > > >> > Yes I am. Would you try attached patch and let me know whether the > >> > patch makes any difference on your box? > >> > >> Sorry to report: The patch was applied (to 8-stable latest code) but out > >> of 3 boots only one succeeded. Same stream of "nfe0: discard frame w/o > >> leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0)" messages. > > > > Ok, back out previous patch and try attached one. > > With these two patch files applied to the 8-stable code, buildkernel > fails as follows. > > /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c: In function 'nfe_attach': > /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' > /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' > /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:630: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_model' > *** Error code 1 > Oops, sorry I forgot that this part of change was not merged to stable/8. I've attached a minimal patch which would be cleanly applied to stable/8. > Sorry, I can't handle 9-stable. Enoch. --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nfe.power.diff3" Index: sys/dev/nfe/if_nfereg.h =================================================================== --- sys/dev/nfe/if_nfereg.h (revision 233822) +++ sys/dev/nfe/if_nfereg.h (working copy) @@ -188,8 +188,9 @@ #define NFE_PWR_VALID (1 << 8) #define NFE_PWR_WAKEUP (1 << 15) -#define NFE_PWR2_WAKEUP_MASK 0x0f11 +#define NFE_PWR2_WAKEUP_MASK 0x0f15 #define NFE_PWR2_REVA3 (1 << 0) +#define NFE_PWR2_PHY_RESET 0x0004 #define NFE_PWR2_GATE_CLOCKS 0x0f00 #define NFE_MEDIA_SET 0x10000 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120404210445.GB10911>