From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 11 07:43:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F57E60 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from euan@potensol.com) Received: from smtp.potensol.com (smtp.potensol.com [103.15.233.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.potensol.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86E01FD6 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from euan@potensol.com) Received: from smtp.potensol.com (smtp.potensol.com [103.15.233.195]) by smtp.potensol.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2916443E9; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.potensol.com (webmail.potensol.com [192.168.10.5]) by smtp.potensol.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A42F443E8; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:43:52 +0000 (UTC) content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" in-reply-to: <55793A5D.4000903@gwdg.de> from: "Euan Thoms" X-Forward: 192.168.10.5 date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:43:51 +0800 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org to: "Rainer Hurling" MIME-Version: 1.0 message-id: <72ad-55793c00-2d-6b8b4580@30728770> subject: =?utf-8?q?Re:_New_port_with_USES=3Dgmake_will_not_stage?= User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.2.14 content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:43:57 -0000 On Thursday, June 11, 2015 15:35 SGT, Rainer Hurling = wrote: > > I am wondering, if there is a small typo in your PORTNAME. Shouldn't = it > be 'opensips1-tls' instead of 'opensips1-lts' (lts -> tls)? > > And why do you use 'opensips1' instead of 'opensips'? PORTVERSION > already includes the version number. It seems, this complicates the = > subsequent setting of WRKSRC etc ... > No, it's not a typo. It's version 1.11.5 LTS (Long Term Support), so I= named it opensips1-lts so that the current stable (v2.1.0) could be ca= lled opensips or opensips2. In other words I'm thinking further down th= e line. But I'm personally most interested in a LTS branch. I needs the= upgrade stability, rather than new features. -- Regards, Euan Thoms