From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Wed Apr 14 19:22:55 2021
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45FE5E57A3
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FLC6l6BWXz3swW
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id D47AC5E5974; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43E95E555C
 for <ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FLC6l5W2jz3t7J
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
 id 1lWl64-000O6k-0E; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:22:44 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:22:43 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <freebsd@gushi.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rclint: two thoughts
Message-ID: <YHdBA3eqJMchQ01e@home.opsec.eu>
References: <2738d12-8b12-b873-cac2-ad6a3ced8ff@prime.gushi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2738d12-8b12-b873-cac2-ad6a3ced8ff@prime.gushi.org>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FLC6l5W2jz3t7J
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	 REPLY(-4.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:22:55 -0000

Hi!

> Second:
> 
> In trying to play with rclint both to validate the port I maintain, as
> well as some internal rc.d scripts we use at the day job, I'm finding
> *most* ports (and a good portion of base) don't pass rclint cleanly.  Is
> this something worth pushing pr's (with patches) for, or would that just
> waste everyone's time?

It's the first time I've heard of rclint, thanks for the pointer!

So it's probably a good idea to submit a few PRs for the most
important rc scripts and then look if/how fast they are fixed.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    Now what ?