Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:46:57 +0100
From:      "C. P. Ghost" <>
To:        Shane Ambler <>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <>
Subject:   Re: Status of Xen/Dom0 on FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <5151C85D.4050702@ShaneWare.Biz>
References:  <> <5151C85D.4050702@ShaneWare.Biz>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Shane Ambler <> wrote:

> On 26/03/2013 23:30, C. P. Ghost wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm wondering if there's been some progress on the Xen/Dom0
>> front recently. The Wiki
>> still doesn't show any improvements in this area, but it may
>> also be outdated (?).
> Not sure about any Xen/Dom0 work but I get the impression that bhyve is
> the focus of freebsd development in that area.
Interesting! Thanks for the hint.

However, that's not what I'm looking for. I'm interested in running
a type-1 Hypervisor with FreeBSD as the host (as in Xen/Dom0) and
all kinds of DomU clients (FreeBSD, Linux, Windows, etc.). The host
machine will be a server with at least 90 GB RAM (later up to 512 GB)
and plenty of SAS/SATA drives.

Since I'm considering running ZFS on those drives at the host level,
and serving the clients on top of that, FreeBSD as Xen/Dom0 seems
like a good idea... if it was already available. However, I'm not sure
yet if ZFS would be advisable for this scenario or if it would kill
performance. If not, I wouldn't mind running Xen/Dom0 with some
lightweight Linux distro as host, and FreeBSD as DomU. It wouldn't
be as nice as a native FreeBSD setup, but it's better than nothing.


Cordula's Web.

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>