From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 7 09:05:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E5416A4CE; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:05:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B13443D2F; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7795G0f062923; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:05:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i7795Gu2062922; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:05:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i77924P7072263; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:02:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Message-Id: <200408070902.i77924P7072263@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Paul Richards From: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 07 Aug 2004 01:45:30 BST." <1091839529.826.14.camel@myrddin> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:02:04 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Colin Percival cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Colin Percival cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ed Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvs Makefile src/kerberos5 Makefile.inc src/lib/libfetch Makefile src/lib/libpam/libpam Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5 Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:05:18 -0000 Paul Richards writes: > On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 23:00, Mark Murray wrote: > > Paul Richards writes: > > > It doesn't however follow that FreeBSD is always exempt from export > > > controls because it might not be if your exporting it as a product, even > > > if that product is just FreeBSD on a CD. > > > > This is just plain incorrect. If it is Open Source, it is exportable. > > Do you have a reference for that assumption? Not offhand, but our company lawyers OKed it. Start with http://www.wassenaar.org, and also look for "crypto law survey" in Google. There is an overwhelmingly large quantity of info there, and you need to look at it very carefully. In particular, finding the bits where "public domain" crypto is excluded from regulation is often frustrating. IIRC, DTI.gov.uk has this covered. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH