From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 12:26:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4768C16A41F; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDE643D49; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:26:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CDDA61F87BF1; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:26:01 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20050913122601.GG563@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Pav Lucistnik , Sergey Matveychuk , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com> <4326A53C.5020808@FreeBSD.org> <1126609121.54365.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B439.4090308@FreeBSD.org> <1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B5CF.1070606@FreeBSD.org> <1126610573.54365.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1126610573.54365.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:26:03 -0000 # pav@FreeBSD.org / 2005-09-13 13:22:53 +0200: > Sergey Matveychuk píše v út 13. 09. 2005 v 15:19 +0400: > > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > > Sounds very specific for a general article on pkg-descr. > > > > > > Wouldn't it be better in Section 6.4 instead? > > > > > > > May be. If I'm sure, I'd give you a patch :) > > Yes I think it would be better there :) Please mail me an exact wording > of a paragraph you want there, I'll handle the SGML and committing for > you. I beg to disagree. I wouldn't be looking for it there. A 3.2.1.1 would be better. Though I don't see a single fourth level chapter in the whole PH. Is that too deep? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991