From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 22:01:22 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829216A421
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [82.208.36.70])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7224E13C43E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C3E19E02A;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2FD19E027;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:18 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4679A3BE.9000807@quip.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:34 +0200
From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com>
References: <E745210E-A5B8-48E0-B6A8-A467F1054BD7@svcolo.com>	<20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org>	<20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com>	<20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org>	<a9f4a3860706201040u1f7e89eane68a7588cd017b96@mail.gmail.com>	<44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com>
	<a9f4a3860706201256s5c4543d6t93448c9c12cf3439@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9f4a3860706201256s5c4543d6t93448c9c12cf3439@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 -0000

Kurt Buff wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script
> (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for
> expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages
> noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as
> well?

I think that topic is not about "how we can do it another way", but why 
this patch was not commited. This patch doesn't change current behavior, 
but allows operator to choose another behavior.
Allowing more choices is always good thing, so I am for commiting this 
patch.

Miroslav Lachman