From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug  9 22:16:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9373B37B401; Sat,  9 Aug 2003 22:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8775E43F75; Sat,  9 Aug 2003 22:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost.jpj.net [127.0.0.1])
	by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7A5GCxN088916;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)h7A5GBAV088913;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:16:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030810032945.GA8393@rot13.obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20030810011011.N83831@blues.jpj.net>
References: <200308100049.h7A0nKU1069195@repoman.freebsd.org>
 <20030810032945.GA8393@rot13.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Absentee maintainership (Re: cvs commit: ports/security/mcrypt
 Makefile)
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:16:15 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:

> This port was scheduled for deletion on May 6, and you were informed
> by private email.  In spite of this fact and the presence of a PR that
> contained the fix, you chose to neglect this port for another 3 months
> until the time came for it to be removed, and I stepped in and
> committed the fix myself.
>
> I'd like to hear your justification of why you think this is an
> appropriate standard of maintainership and why you think you should be
> allowed to continue to "maintain" ports in this way.

The situation is very similar with the qt145 port.  I'd like to see you
tend to your own responsibilities rather than what appears to be a
campaign against me.
-- 
Trevor Johnson