Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:04:35 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> To: Arjan van Leeuwen <avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? Message-ID: <20031119050435.GA22285@pasternak.w.lub.pl> In-Reply-To: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> References: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Arjan van Leeuwen [Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:19:07PM +0100]: Content-Description: signed data > From http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/11/18/1742216 : [...] > SCO is going to attack the 1994 AT&T/BSD settlement. Details here: http://www.windley.com/2003/11/18.html#a919 Anyway, having everything in CVS since beginning still makes BSD situation much better, than Linux. They started using central repository around 2.5.x, and by that time Linux was already over 20 MB of gzipped sources, and - in my opinion - there's rare chance to proove who has been responsible for what. There's nothing to be afraid of. -- Michal Pasternak :: http://pasternak.w.lub.pl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031119050435.GA22285>