From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 21:25:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE016A41F for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:25:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasterdisco@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD76143D53 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasterdisco@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so716731nzd for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:25:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ft4Udx53m+ZqBJKPXQyon5A1xtEsR80BzMSCMHdjr954Ek0Gst0qBPqAEETccPyY5t27FoWWDk3GMbhbxkGFvxy9A+pmfS+jxHdZOrs3ylaTrXfIL6bdLsxB5S/Z5i0vbI0j5BbYO38x4dVZH27p6baomFLcahUS95lDmzfzBB8= Received: by 10.65.234.16 with SMTP id l16mr9683761qbr; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:25:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.43.6 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:25:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:25:30 -0500 From: "matt ." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051126145004.00c17008@sixcompanies.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051126182651.A966@www.pukruppa.net> <43889E27.2010209@makeworld.com> <20051126185500.I966@www.pukruppa.net> <4388A349.9080808@makeworld.com> <4388A5B0.6070005@mainframe.ca> <4388A6E4.1040206@makeworld.com> <4388C27A.8090601@vfs.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20051126145004.00c17008@sixcompanies.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Yesterday's -STABLE kernel corrupts LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:25:33 -0000 FreeBSD should really consider changing the name of their branch name STABL= E to DEV or PRE-RELEASE, since it clearly states on freebsd.org the STABLE branch is for those wishing to track and contribute to the development process of the next FreeBSD RELEASE. It makes sense to leave RELEASE the way it is, since RELEASE branches are meant exactly for how their namesake states. FreeBSD-CURRENT pretty much self-explains what it's meant for, which is the latest, bleeding edge code, which once tested is added to STABLE...or wait, then maybe CURRENT should be called DEV? aaaaahhh!! :) matt On 11/26/05, J.D. Bronson wrote: > > > > I couldnt agree more with this comment. My head hurt after > trying to figure this out as well.. > > Yea. The information seems to contradict itself. > The only thing I have been able to 100% figure out is: > > #*default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_6_0 > -> release branch/security fixes only > Results in: 6.0-RELEASE > > #*default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_6 > -> 6.0 + changes will eventually be 6.1 > Results in: 6.0-STABLE > > It is perhaps a bit easier in OpenBSD land. -STABLE means only > bugfixes and important patches. In FreeBSD - this seems not the case? > > -JD > > >