Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:20:33 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, dhartmei@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf misfeature Message-ID: <86y7d7k6m6.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200711090059.54990.max@love2party.net> (Max Laier's message of "Fri\, 9 Nov 2007 00\:59\:46 %2B0100") References: <86zlxoblmj.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200711082259.46222.max@love2party.net> <86fxzgl63d.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200711090059.54990.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Laier <max@love2party.net> writes: > No, I don't see why these two should behave differently, but you should > add a "scrub in on sk0" in any case. scrub is known and documented to interfere with NFS. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y7d7k6m6.fsf>