From owner-freebsd-gnome Sun Jan 26 12:23:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B886E37B401 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (f35.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1395943F18 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:23:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reigncracks@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:23:42 -0800 Received: from 68.103.37.247 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 20:23:42 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.103.37.247] From: "Mezz bsdforums.org" To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looks like Ghostview 1.99.97's AA fonts not works? Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:42 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2003 20:23:42.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1EA0F00:01C2C578] Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 14:46, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: > > > > > > > > It still doesn't has AA fonts, so must be issue with font in pdf >that > > >author > > > > has chosen? Or fonts in my box? It looks very smooth in Windows with > > >Adobe > > > > Acrobat Reader. > > > > > >Can you send me the document? I have had no problem with ggv and > > >anti-aliasing even back in ggv for GNOME 1.4. > > > > Yes, here's link.. -> > > http://www.recruit2recruit.net/kerframil/ml350-install.pdf > >It must be the way the document was saved. Both Acrobat and ggv2 on my >machine look the same as yours. Acrobat shows it a little "softer" >which makes it look better, but when you zoom in, the fonts are still >very jagged. > >This looks fine in Acrobat: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/CURRENT/early-adopter.pdf > >But ggv2 only AAs the larger fonts. This is most likely due to what's >stated here: > >http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/2.1.3-explained.html > >To quote: > >I.5. I've upgraded, and my text is still ugly. Why ? > >You might be using low-quality fonts. For example, some versions of the >Ghostscript fonts (Nimbus et al...) are notorious for containing poor or >even buggy hints, and this generally produces bad output with FreeType. >Try to experiment with other fonts (the Luxi ones are pretty). Thanks Joe! Ok, I like Adobe Acrobat better than Ghostview. It surely looks so smooth in that early-adopter.pdf. Also, Ghostview is kind of slow from what I compare with Adobe Acrobat. Maybe, I can try to open it with the pdf editor and modify the font, then save it as with the smoother font. Maybe, I can try it on the Windows machine. Thanks again, Mezz _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message