Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:50:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, Quake Lee <quakelee@geekcn.org> Subject: Re: Routing: local link vs VPN provided route Message-ID: <20080806145031.9c94326a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4899F1AB.8080409@delphij.net> References: <4899F1AB.8080409@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>: > > We have recently working on an OpenVPN scenario and we have found that > when there is a locally linked network, the route provided by OpenVPN > would not work: > > - - Local network uses 192.168.1.0/24 network (thus we have a flags 'UC' > route) > > - - Upon connection, the VPN would provide a route to 192.168.1.0/24 > through the tun0 device. > > It seems, however, that the packets would just go to local network. Is > it possible to get packets to non-conflicting IP addresses (i.e. only > exist in either local network, or remote VPN'ed network) to go through > the tun0 device? Any hack you would do to make this work is going to be unreliable at best. Renumber your network so that routing can work as designed. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080806145031.9c94326a.wmoran>