Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 May 1999 21:49:04 -0500
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PCWeek article by Anne Chen -- Comments 
Message-ID:  <199905060249.VAA32916@nospam.hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>  of "Wed, 05 May 1999 18:55:00 PDT." <38849.925955700@zippy.cdrom.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
> > So, your saying that FreeBSD can read in the binary and begin
> > executing machine instructions without any processing in between, or
> 
> Correct.  It's still an x86 binary and everything in it that's not
> trapping to the kernel for services is going to be executed exactly as
> it is under Linux; its shared libraries will be loaded (out of some
> part of /compat/linux/...), its accesses to many common system devices
> (like the vga console) dealt with appropriately by compatibility
> support in the driver, etc.  As far as the binary's concerned, it's
> running on a Linux box.  When it makes a system call, that goes
> through whatever syscall table has been mapped in with the process by
> the image activator (the bit which handles getting /bin/ls into memory
> so it can actually run) and if it's a Linux binary image activator, it
> simply maps in a different syscall table than the FreeBSD ELF binary
> image activator does.  No extra overhead, just a switch pointing in
> a different direction (so to speak).

So rather than "Linux Emulation" would it not be better understood if 
we said, "FreeBSD supports the Linux ABI (Application Binary 
Interface)"?

By writting to a common ABI (Win32) isn't that how Windows applications 
are supposed to run under Win95, Win98, and WinNT? And eventually isn't 
WINE supposed to do this too? In any case, the FreeBSD Linux 
emulation/ABI/whatever works pretty darn good. I've had better luck 
running i386 Linux binaries than i386 NetBSD.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905060249.VAA32916>