Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:17:50 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Miha Nedok <mike@voyager.unix-systems.net>, Vitor de Matos Carvalho <listas@softinfo.com.br> Cc: Stable <FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: spontaneous reboot Message-ID: <200309040817.50478.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <20030901144337.L94253@voyager.zrcalo.si> References: <200308310040.18658.kellers@njit.edu> <008501c37012$cc6577f0$020aa8c0@acaraje> <20030901144337.L94253@voyager.zrcalo.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 01 September 2003 05:44 am, Miha Nedok wrote:
> -STABLE name does *not* mean it is really stable. This was discused a
> zillion years before. But run what you want to run.
FreeBSD-STABLE is the stable development branch. If the words
"development branch" don't explain the situation to you, nothing else
will. If you run -STABLE, you are expected to read the stable mail list,
keep up with what is there, and make intelligent decisions about when to
upgrade.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309040817.50478.wes>