From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 18 05:56:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A93916A4CE for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 05:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-49-130.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.49.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149BD43D96 for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BQ483-000O2c-QK; Tue, 18 May 2004 14:55:34 +0200 Message-ID: <40AA07C3.7020902@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:55:31 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernan Aguero References: <200405180338.i4I3cNhH044522@quark.rcs.purdue.edu> <20040518122335.GB99674@iib.unsam.edu.ar> In-Reply-To: <20040518122335.GB99674@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:56:53 -0000 Fernan Aguero wrote: > +----[ linimon@freebsd.org (18.May.2004 00:34): > | > | portname: biology/seaview > | broken because: Checksum mismatch > | build errors: none. > | overview: http://portsmon.firepipe.net/portoverview.py?category=biology&portname=seaview > | > +----] > > I will take care of this one. I have already contacted the > author to see if he can confirm the new checksum (there's > no version numbers, so it's difficult to tell what has > changed). > > I will report back (or just send-pr) when I have something. Verifying the diffs of the old and the new file is fine too. Maybe it's just change in the date of a copyright line... -Oliver