Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:46:18 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: Feb 2005 Snapshots for FreeBSD available Message-ID: <4212275A.1090402@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200502151743.03599.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <421174F7.6020305@samsco.org> <42122359.9080105@root.org> <200502151741.30286.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200502151743.03599.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>> >>>>On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote: >>>> >>>>>Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least >>>>>publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would >>>>>help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially >>>>>when it's from areas that are under active development. >>>> >>>>The snapshots on snapshots.[jp|se].freebsd.org are date-suffixed >>>>(however, those servers don't build snaps for all platforms). >>> >>>I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks. >> >>Well, the builds on jp are always generated from source of 15:00 UTC of >>that date. The se machine probably uses a fixed time as well, but I can't >>look it up at the moment (hardware troubles at the se site). > > > And thinking about it, so probably does the snapbuilder which produces those > snaps on ftp.freebsd.org ... Scott? :-) > Yes, the lack of a published timestamp is an oversight in this experiment. I'm working on correcting it. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4212275A.1090402>