From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 16:46:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FEA16A4CE; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:46:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E0543D1D; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:46:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.19] (ibook-nai.samsco.home [192.168.254.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1FGkdQa034831; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:46:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4212275A.1090402@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:46:18 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Nottebrock References: <421174F7.6020305@samsco.org> <42122359.9080105@root.org> <200502151741.30286.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200502151743.03599.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200502151743.03599.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: Feb 2005 Snapshots for FreeBSD available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:46:24 -0000 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>> >>>>On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote: >>>> >>>>>Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least >>>>>publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would >>>>>help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially >>>>>when it's from areas that are under active development. >>>> >>>>The snapshots on snapshots.[jp|se].freebsd.org are date-suffixed >>>>(however, those servers don't build snaps for all platforms). >>> >>>I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks. >> >>Well, the builds on jp are always generated from source of 15:00 UTC of >>that date. The se machine probably uses a fixed time as well, but I can't >>look it up at the moment (hardware troubles at the se site). > > > And thinking about it, so probably does the snapbuilder which produces those > snaps on ftp.freebsd.org ... Scott? :-) > Yes, the lack of a published timestamp is an oversight in this experiment. I'm working on correcting it. Scott