Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:40:05 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski <wg@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r321141 - head/devel/glog Message-ID: <20130720064005.GA91152@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307191118260.3414@trevally.site> References: <201306171644.r5HGiqSr058369@svn.freebsd.org> <20130618033635.GC57172@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1306181849380.1789@trevally.site> <20130718135432.GA37227@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307191118260.3414@trevally.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:20:49AM -0600, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Interesting; please tell us the summary at the end of the discussions as > > I'm always interested in USE_GCC logic. Ideally, it should allow to select > > from 1) system GCC (4.2) on Clang-default versions of FreeBSD, and 2) nice, > > stable, non-volatile, LTS, whatever, GCC version that does not have to be > > rebuilt every few weeks, when system compiler (either GCC 4.2 or Clang) is > > not sufficient. > > If you want to go for a stable (and reasonable, unlike GCC 4.2 -- > regardless of lang/gcc42 or the old system compiler) version of > GCC then lang/gcc is the answer. > > USE_GCC=yes requests that and should be preferred over any specific > version numbers where possible. Right; USE_GCC=(any|yes) works sanely for a while now, and is what I use when cannot figure out the patch to make software compiler-agnostic fast enough. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130720064005.GA91152>